Legal Opinion

County Commissioners v. Wise

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1889PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion, of the Court. First, Second, Third and Fourth Exceptions, are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion, of the Court. First, Second, Third and Fourth Exceptions, are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the Court. Fifth Exception. — The plaintiffs offered the three following prayers: 1. If the jury find that the bridge above Millford mills was carried away by a flood on the 3rd day of August, 1885, and in passing down the stream carried away plaintiffs' dam, then plaintiffs are entitled to recover such sum as will compensate them for the injury sustained and loss suffered; provided the jury also find that the location,…

1Opinion of the Court

McSherry, J.,

delivered the'opinion of the Court.

On the eleventh day of February, 1885, Sarah A. Wise became the owner of a saw mill and a grist mill, located on Deer Creek in Harford County. Prior to her purchase of the property the County Commissioners changed the bed of a public road, which formerly crossed the stream below the breast of the mill-dam, and located it some short distance above the dam. They constructed at the same time an iron bridge across the creek connecting with this.new road. On the third of August, 1885, a destructive freshet demolished the bridge. The mill-dam was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Noonan v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. The Rochester White Lead Co. v. . the City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Hitchins Bros. v. Mayor of FrostburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BlocherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  5. Crook v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. Fairfield Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Guest v. Commissioners of Church HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. DeLauder v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. United Railways & Electric Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. County Commissioners v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API