Legal Opinion

Seibert v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 14, 1970No. 55911PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this suit attacking the validity of the annexation of seven separate tracts of land by the defendant, City of Columbia. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss “on the ground that the cause of action set up in plaintiffs’ petition is res judicata.” Plaintiffs have duly appealed. We have jurisdiction because an issue raised by plaintiffs would, if decided, require a construction of constitutional provisions. Although we find it unnecessary to specifically decide that question our jurisdiction remains. Haley v. Horjul, Inc., Mo.Sup., 281 S.W.2d 832.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Hannibal v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. McDonnell Aircraft Corporation v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. State v. ChampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Haley v. Horjul, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. White v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. American Polled Hereford Ass'n v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Norval v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State at the Information of Martin v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass'n Local No. 73 v. StemmlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API