Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 2005No. 2004-0701Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAlice Robie Resnick, J.
{¶ 82} I disagree with the majority’s decision insofar as it reduces the back-pay award to appellant and cross-appellee, Dorsie Stacy, by the amounts he received in benefits from the School Employees Retirement System (“SERS”) and would have received in wages had he accepted employment with Laidlaw Transit, Inc. In my opinion, these offsets are inappropriate under the present circumstances.
{¶ 83} In finding that Stacy’s back-pay award should not be reduced by the amount of benefits he received from the SERS, the court of appeals explained, “Stacy received these benefits due to his years of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- United Protective Workers Of America, Local No. 2 v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Sporn v. Celebrity, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.