Legal Opinion

Gissendanner v. Temples

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1936No. 4 Div. 886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Action of trespass for assault and battery. There was verdict for defendant, and on motion of plaintiff a new trial was granted, from which ruling defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The trial court entertained the view error was committed in the refusal of charges 3 and 4, requested by plaintiff, and places liis ruling thereon, though in this court other grounds of the motion may also be considered in justification of his action. Conner v. Central of Georgia R. R. Co., 221 Ala. 358, 128 So. 789. But there is here no occasion to consider grounds other than those designated by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. GambillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Empire Clothing Co. v. HammonsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Conner v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The B. F. Goodrich Tire Company v. E. H. LysterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Lassetter v. KingAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Evans v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Cooper v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Independent Life & Accident Insurance v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API