Bolt v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Bolt, having pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of possession of over five grams of cannabis, appeals contending the sentence imposed upon him was erroneous and disproportionate to that received by his co-defendant. Since the sentence imposed does not exceed the statutory maximum provided by the legislature for a violation of Section 893.13(l)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1977), we are without authority to review the sentence. Walker v. State, 44 So.2d 814 (Fla.1950). Rohdin v. State, 105 So.2d 371 (Fla.2d DCA 1958). It does appear that the trial court may have been under the impression that Bolt…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Rohdin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jennings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985