Wolf v. Estate of Wolf
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
CURLEY, PJ.
¶ 1. Shirley A. Wolf appeals from an order denying her attorney fees as the named personal representative and proponent of the will of Frances V Wolf (the Estate, unless otherwise specified). We conclude that the applicable statutory language is clear that there is no prevailing party and no appealable contested matter where a will contest results in settlement; as such, the trial court properly denied Shirley Wolfs claim for attorney fees. See Wis. Stat. § 879.37 (2007-08). Consequently, we affirm.
I. Background.
¶ 2. This appeal arises out of a contest over the will of Frances…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Schlieper v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Troy v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017