Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sharp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1986No. 4-86-1382Published

1ConcurrenceGlickstein, Judge

At trial, the following occurred:

Q. Mr. Bergin, after you and your brother went back to that location to look at the truck, what did you do?

A. I made a decision that I didn’t want no part of the truck, period.

Q. Why not?

A. Because I knowed — I personally knowed the truck was stolen. I mean, I buy eight or ten trucks a week.

Defense counsel objected and moved for a mistrial. The objection was sustained, but the motion was denied. Out of the jury’s hearing, the witness was instructed not to give his opinion. The jury returned and were instructed as to the fact that the witness was not qualified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API