Legal Opinion
Martin v. Brodrick
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 6, 1949No. 3270PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOTT, District Judge.
The issue before the court is whether an additional refund of estate tax may be ■allowed, the funds of the estate having been expended for attorneys’ fees and court costs in securing an earlier refund of estate tax, the amount so expended being in excess of the amount claimed in the estate tax return. The basic facts are, by this reference, found to be as stipulated and as admitted in the pleadings.
Rosa Baumstark, a resident of Sedgwick County, Kansas, died testate on October 15, 1943. Her estate was duly administered in the Probate Court of that county. Her executors…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Guettel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Cleveland v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Moir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- United States v. C. C. Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buscaglia v. de ContribucionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
- Buscaglia v. Tax CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951