Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 18, 1927No. 11,721PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The grounds of the motion are, in substance, but one : That it does not appear that the bill contains all the evidence. That is not ground for striking it and the motion must be denied.

The function of the bill of exceptions is to make that a part of the record ydiich would otherwise not be such. Formerly, when an exception was taken, counsel then and there prepared his bill and the judge certified it, saying that “ forasmuch as. these matters do not appear of record the [plaintiff] presents this his bill of exceptions, and prays that it may be made a part thereof, which is accordingly done.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MurdoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Charles v. E. F. Hallack Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Dexter v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. City of Detroit v. GrummondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  5. First National Bank of Anna v. RuskAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dickinson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API