Legal Opinion
Ranger v. Motor Vehicles Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 28, 1993No. CV91-113; CA A72423PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Petitioner seeks review of the trial court’s affirmance of Motor Vehicle Division’s (MVD) order suspending his driver’s license because he refused to submit to an Intoxilyzer test. ORS 813.100(3). We affirm.
Petitioner was arrested for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He asked to consult with an attorney before submitting to a breath test. He wanted to call the Oregon State Police (OSP) office where his brother was employed, so that his brother could suggest an attorney. At the jail, he was given access to a telephone that permitted only collect calls. Officers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Illinois v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moore v. STATE, MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gildroy v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Walls v. Driver & Motor Vehicle ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Brown v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Hoefling v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Walls v. Driver & Motor Vehicle ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.