Legal Opinion

S. C. Loveland Co., Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Union Mechling Corp., Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 31, 1976No. 75-1310PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by District Judge BRYAN.

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Jr., District Judge:

This is a review of two decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereafter the “Commission”). Jurisdiction is present by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 2342(5). The first decision, on November 8, 1974, granted to the intervenor Hoffman International, Inc. (“Hoffman”) an exemption under § 303(e)(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 903(e)(2) (the “Act”). This action of the Commission granted Hoffman an exemption from the regulatory requirements of Part III of the Act. In effect the exemption…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laurence Gage v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America Commonwealth Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. National Bus Traffic Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Orrville v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Water Transport Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Aero Mayflower Transit Company, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, and Bekins Van Lines Company, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Simmons v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API