Legal Opinion

Keith A. Noe v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1965No. 19498Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was convicted of first degree burglary, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal to the state supreme court (State v. Noe, 1963, 93 Ariz. 373, 381 P.2d 99). He later sought habeas corpus in the state court, which was denied.

We have examined the transcript and the exhibits, and we conclude that the evidence supports the findings of fact, that the findings support the conclusions of law, and that the decision is correct.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. NoeArizona Supreme Court · 1963