Legal Opinion

Jarrett v. Cruse

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 1947No. 16,646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE: legislature by the enactment of section 5, chapter 177, Session Laws 1943, authorized the imposition of a tax equivalent to two per cent of the value of services rendered or performed by persons engaging in certain businesses, including "machine shops."

Pursuant to the authority vested in him, defendant in error, hereafter designated as director, imposed a tax April 26, 1944, upon the business of defendant in error, to whom we hereafter refer as Jarrett, in the sum of $1,708.13. Jarrett, pursuant to the provisions of the above-mentioned act, filed a petition and protest to said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Adjustment v. HandleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. State Board of Medical Examiners v. SpearsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Hawkins v. HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  4. State Civil Service Commission v. CummingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Doran v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Civil Service Commission v. HazlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  2. Bacon v. SteigmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Commission v. HazlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API