Legal Opinion

Pifer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 8, 2009No. 2D08-1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Chad Pifer challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand because the postconviction court should have considered his motion as if it were filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Pifer pleaded guilty to the offenses charged in eighteen separate cases and was sentenced to twelve years’ incarceration to be followed by ten years’ drug offender probation. In his rule 3.800(a) motion, Pifer alleged that his sentence was illegal because it exceeded the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dellofano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Hettick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Riviere v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pifer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Almodovar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API