Legal Opinion
Frazier v. Hanover Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
According to plaintiff’s allegations, plaintiff and others of a class on whose behalf he sues are entitled, by virtue of contracts with the Republic of Peru, to receive certain scrip certificates (promises by Peru to pay designated sums to the bearer thereof) which Peru has delivered to defendant with instructions to deliver them to persons other than plaintiff and the other members of such class; and in compliance with such instructions defendant is about to deliver such scrip certificates to such other persons.
Plaintiff accordingly has brought this action to enjoin defendant from diverting…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Morrison v. WorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States Ex Rel. Goldberg v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Oregon v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frazier v. Foreign Bondholders Protective Council, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953