Blocker Exploration Co. v. Frontier Exploration, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentQuinn, Chief Justice
The majority acknowledges that where an express agreement provides for a right to participate in the management or control *990of the mining operation, the absence of any actual exercise of that right should not preclude a finding that the joint operation element of a mining partnership exists. 740 P.2d at 987. However, the majority then concludes that under this standard Blocker Exploration Company’s rights did not rise to the level of active participation in control or management. I disagree with this conclusion, and accordingly dissent from that portion of the majority opinion holding that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Ayco Development Corp. v. G. E. T. Service Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Shell Oil Company, a Corporation v. Lanus Wayne PrestidgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Mud Control Laboratories v. CoveyUtah Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.