Legal Opinion
Castroll v. Township of Franklin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 24, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
161 N.J. Super. 190 (1978)
391 A.2d 544
HARRY E. CASTROLL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN ET AL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted April 17, 1978.
Decided July 24, 1978.
Before Judges ALLCORN, HORN and FURMAN.
Thomas J. Cafferty, attorney for appellants.
Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.C., attorneys for respondent (Mr. Richard A. Norris on the brief).
2Per curiam
A review of the record in this case makes plain that plaintiffs-developers completely failed to establish any special reasons within the contemplation of subsection (d) of N.J.S.A.…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of MadisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Glen Wall Associates v. Wall TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Parisi v. North Bergen Mun. Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985