Legal Opinion
Penland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 8, 2024No. 8:21-cv-03000Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION Tracy W. Penland, ) ) C.A. No. 8:21-3000-HMH Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) OPINION & ORDER ) Metropolitan Life Insurance ) Company, ) ) Defendant. ) This matter is before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. On June 22, 2022, the court entered an order affirming Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (“MetLife”) denial of long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits to Tracy W. Penland (“Penland”) under a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bunnell v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.