Legal Opinion

New York Life Ins. v. Simplex Products Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1939No. 27251PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The plaintiff’s claim is primarily based upon the contention that the rights of the mortgagor of real estate in a lease thereon, though executed subsequent to the mortgage, pass to the mortgagee upon its acquisition of the premises by purchase upon foreclosure, and are enforceable by it against the tenant. The question is thus presented in this case as to the effect of the foreclosure of such mortgage and the sale of the premises upon the rights' and obligations of the tenant of the premises in question under such lease, it not being a party to the foreclosure proceeding.

It must be conceded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Downard v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Buena Vista Fruit & Vineyard Co. v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Burke v. WillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. McDermott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. brandon/wiant Co. v. TeamorOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Department of Illinois Disabled American Veterans v. BialczakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Liberal Savings & Loan Co. v. Frankel Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hembree v. Mid-America Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Hinojos v. LohmannColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API