Legal Opinion

Jonna v. DIVERSEY CORPORATION

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1962No. Docket 15, Calendar 49,777Published

1Per curiam

As in Grossbart v. Gilbert, 364 Mich 96, “this is a prime example of the kind of case which ought not to be here on appeal.” It presents no question of reviewable merit and becomes another usurper of that constantly pressing time appellate courts must devote assiduously to work of critical importance.

May 24,1961, plaintiff as purchaser and defendant as seller signed an agreement for the sale and purchase of real estate. The agreement included the following provision:

“9. In the event of default by the seller hereunder, the purchaser may, at his option, elect to enforce the terms hereof, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sroka v. Catsman Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Grossbart v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API