Legal Opinion

Watts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 13, 2000No. A00A1084PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Zane Phillip Watts was convicted of rape and incest. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and also contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress, permitting hearsay testimony, and giving an erroneous charge. For reasons discussed below, we affirm.

1. Count 1 of the indictment charged Watts with forcibly raping K. T., his girlfriend’s daughter, between September 1, 1996, and November 23, 1997. Watts contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict on this count, arguing that the State presented no evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Bickley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Cobb v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API