People v. Wolf
Suffolk County District Court
1Opinion of the CourtAngelo Mauceri, J.
The defendants move to dismiss the information on the ground that the offense of section 140.10 of the Penal Law, criminal trespass in the third degree, is not stated in the information.
The information charges the following: “ on the 20th of March, 1970, at Bay Shore, Town of Islip, at about 10:30 in the forenoon of that day, the defendants committed the violation of Criminal Trespass in the third degree by wrongfully, intentionally, knowingly did after being ordered by your deponent, Deputy Commissioner of Social Services Department at 10:15 a.m. on March 19th, 1970, to leave the interior of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Florette D.New York City Family Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. NunezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1980
- Turney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
- People v. BembryUtica City Court · 1985
- People v. MarinoJustice Court of Village of Port Chester · 1986
- People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.