Elliott v. International Paper Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Justice
In the present case, International Paper Company (“IP”), entered into two contracts with other parties pursuant to which those parties were to supply raw material, i.e., harvested timber, needed by IP for the production by IP of plywood at its plywood-manufacturing plant in Butler County. The materials before us indicate that IP’s agents entered into these contracts in various counties other than Co-necuh County, and there is no evidence indicating that IP and Chapman Forest Products, Inc. — the respondents here — actually ever received any timber harvested in Conecuh County pursuant to these…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. MoseleIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Ex Parte Scott Bridge CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Gardner v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Estano v. Greenetrack, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.