State v. Rogers
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADELE HEDGES, Chief Justice.
The State of Texas brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s quashing of a theft indictment against appellee, Brian Rogers. In two issues, the State contends that the trial court erred (1) in determining in advance of trial whether the State’s evidence would be sufficient to prove an element of the offense and (2) in relying on defense counsel’s disputed statements in quashing the indictment. We reverse and remand.
Background
The grand jury alleged in the indictment that, over a five-and-a-half year period, appellee unlawfully acquired or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Callins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Kellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Thomason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- Woodson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- State v. Miguel Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2018
- Kerry Bernard Laurent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Keith Wayne Frances v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.