Legal Opinion

Kamenesh v. Kamenesh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 3, 2003No. Nos. 3D03-642, 3D03-419Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

On these consolidated appeals by the ex-wife from two adverse post-trial orders in the parties’ dissolution case, we affirm one and reverse the other.

I

The first dispute concerns the distribution of $30,000 recovered from the forfeited deposit of a potential purchaser who defaulted on an agreement to buy the parties’ marital home subsequent to the dissolution. The trial court awarded the entire $30,000 to the former husband on the theory that the controversy was covered by an agreed provision in the marital settlement agreement and final judgment that the former wife…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Paulucci v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Fla. Power & Light Co. v. CANAL AUTHORITY, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Brandt v. BrandtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Davis v. DieujusteSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API