Legal Opinion · Dissent

MacKey v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2010No. 2007-CT-01785-SCTPublished

1DissentRandolph, Justice

¶ 29. On the record presented, I cannot join the Majority in finding that the trial court abused its discretion in including a banishment condition in its sentencing order. However, even if one were to assume arguendo that the banishment condition, as part of Mackey’s suspended sentence, is ipso jure illegal, the Majority errs by rendering a modified sentence, as opposed to vacating the guilty plea. We are not told how a defendant can knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily plead guilty to an illegal or unlawful condition of a sentence. If illegal or unlawful, Mackey should be accorded the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McCreary v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cobb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  5. MacKey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API