Legal Opinion
State v. Arthur
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 19, 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
877 A.2d 1183 (2005)
184 N.J. 307
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Michael ARTHUR, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 15, 2005.
Decided July 19, 2005.
Roger L. Camacho, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).
Sara B. Liebman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Theodore J. Romankow, Union County Prosecutor, attorney; Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, on the letter in lieu of brief).
Judge SKILLMAN (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.