Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Christman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1990No. 89-30090PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether the district court erred in sentencing the defendant under the Sentencing Guidelines when it found (1) he was a “minor” rather than a “minimal” participant in the offense, and (2) he willfully impeded or obstructed the administration of justice. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

BACKGROUND

A federal grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against three defendants, including Robert Christman, alleging drug offenses. Christman was charged with using the telephone to negotiate the price and quantity of drugs on behalf…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Raul Martin Franco-Torres and Manuel Velo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Joseph William GillockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Londell Williams, United States of America v. Tammy J. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Arthur Howard Hill, AKA Sonny HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Andes-Mar Pereira BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Pedro Prieto-VillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Ruben Taren-Palma, United States of America v. Ismael Calderon-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API