Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Morse

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ON Exceptions from Nisi Prius, Howard, J., presiding. Report oe Referees. Two of these cases, viz. William Mayberry v. Benjamin Morse, and Stephen P. Mayberry v. Benj. Morse & al., were referred under a rule of Court to the same referees. The other case of William Mayberry v. Benjamin Morse, was a submission entered into before a justice of the peace and before the same referees.

Read the full summary

ON Exceptions from Nisi Prius, Howard, J., presiding. Report oe Referees. Two of these cases, viz. William Mayberry v. Benjamin Morse, and Stephen P. Mayberry v. Benj. Morse & al., were referred under a rule of Court to the same referees. The other case of William Mayberry v. Benjamin Morse, was a submission entered into before a justice of the peace and before the same referees. When the reports were presented for acceptance, the defendant, Morse, moved for a recommitment of the first two reports, and that the third be continued to await their result, upon certain evidence by him introduced…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

AppleioN,- J.

— It was held in Codman v. Strout, 22 Maine, 292, not to be competent to blend two suits, where the parties are different, in one bill of exceptions, and thus bring them before the Court for detérmination. Each party aggrieved by any adjudication should file his several exceptions, and thus obtain the redress of his several grievances. The exceptions therefore must be regarded as having been improperly allowed.

As the questions here presented are of importance in practice, and may occasionally occur, it has been deemed expedient Jmefly to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parkhurst v. First National Bank of ClydeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API