Legal Opinion
Tuberman v. Hall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered December 10, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, dismissed plaintiff-appellant Steven Tuber man’s complaint, alleging “serious injury” under Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court properly dismissed plaintiffs complaint as against the Hall defendants. The Hall defendants satisfied their prima facie burden of establishing that plaintiff did not sustain a statutorily-defined serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Shinn v Catanzaro, 1 AD3d 195, 197 [2003]). The reports…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Shinn v. CatanzaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Santos v. TaverasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camilo v. Villa Livery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Reyes v. Se ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Camilo v. Villa Livery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Jacobs v. RolonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Roach v. Citywide Mobile Response Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.