Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Manito-woc county: John Goodlahd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, 0. J.

This action was commenced September 28, 1891, by the service of a summons. The complaint alleges, in effect, that the plaintiff’s intestate was killed instantly, by the gross negligence of the defendant,. October 3, 1895; that he left five minor children, whose ages ranged from nine to nineteen years, but no widow; and that the plaintiff was appointed such administrator September 28, 1697.

The defendant answered by way of plea in abatement to the effect that the deceased left, him surviving, five minor children, but no widow, as stated; that upon the petition of • the brother of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. O'Dell v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Spider Lake Saw Mill & Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Johnson v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bloor v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Flood v. KerwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Robertson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API