Commonwealth v. McFall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Appellant’s counsel in the Superior Court filed a brief which was merely a xeroxed copy of a brief wholly prepared by appellant himself. This clearly constitutes a denial of appellant’s right to effective assistance of counsel on his appeal. Commonwealth v. Villano, 435 Pa. 273, 256 A. 2d 468 (1969). The judgment of the Superior Court is therefore vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. VillanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. ReevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. ReevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970