Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Town of Irondequoit
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The plaintiff in this negligence -action seeks to recover damages for the death of her testate husband, Bernard E. Bauman, a volunteer fireman who met his death August 27, 1952.
*496Defendants have made this motion under rule 106 to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The basis of the motion as stated on the argument is that plaintiff’s testate, being a volunteer fireman, comes within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Munro v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Suffolk Laundry Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Greater Poughkeepsie Library District v. Town of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Moon v. FinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968