Legal Opinion

Castelazo & Associates v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 11, 1971No. C.D. 4251Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

Eight protests were consolidated for purposes of trial. Plaintiffs abandoned all claims except as to items [for men’s rainwear] described in (the invoices as “parka suits” items 6420, 6550, 6540,6760 and 6740 in protests 63/10403, 63/10421, 63/10424, 63/10431 and 63/10444. (R. 14,18,19, and plaintiffs’ brief pp. 3,4.) *

Protests 63/11248, 63/10412, and 63/11262 were originally included in the consolidation but have not been briefed by either party, and were in effect abandoned during the trial. They are, therefore, dismissed. Arden Manufacturing Company v. United States, 65 Cust.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Arden Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API