Legal Opinion

Densten Hair Co. v. United Leather Workers International Union of America

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Two bills in equity, filed in the Superior Court on April 1, 1920, each against the same incorporated labor union and some of its officers and agents, to enjoin unlawful interference on the part of the defendants with the plaintiff’s business.

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

In each of these suits, filed April 1, 1920, the plaintiffs severally seek to have the defendants enjoined from interference with their business. The cases upon reference were heard together by a master, who made a report to which no exceptions *201were taken and which has been confirmed. The report was heard by a judge of the Superior Court, who entered a final decree in favor of the plaintiffs. From that decree the defendants appealed and the cases are before this court on the question whether upon the facts found by the master the decree is justified by the bill and record. French v. Peters,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M. Steinert & Sons Co. v. TagenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. French v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Folsom Engraving Co. v. McNeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Gordon v. BoransMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Jeffery-De Witt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Samuel Hertzig Corp. v. GibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Gentile v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API