Legal Opinion

Keim v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leo F. Hayes, J.

This CPLR article 78 proceeding was brought by owners of several residences in the vicinity of 805 Comstock Avenue, Syracuse, New York. What is upsetting them is the city’s decision to issue a building permit to the owner of premises located at 805 Comstock Avenue, permitting him to renovate his property. They say that in approving the renovation plan, the city has violated the provisions of the local zoning ordinances limiting the right of a nonconforming user to extend, enlarge or change the way he uses his property. (Zoning Regulations of City of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. John P. v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Albert v. Board of Standards & Appeals of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Fairmeadows Mobile Village, Inc. v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. People v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilcove v. Town of Pittsford Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API