Legal Opinion

Harrod v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 10, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Sant, Comissionee

Affirming.

Appellant was found guilty of the crime of breaking and entering into a storehouse, and having previously been convicted of two other felonies, was convicted of having violated the Habitual Criminal Act. He was sentenced to serve the remainder of his life in the Kentucky State Reformatory. He seeks reversal an the following grounds: (1) the Commonwealth failed to prove the venue of the crime; (2) the Commonwealth failed to prove a “breakin”; (3) the court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the law of insanity; (4) the court erred in overruling appellant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Osborne v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Harrod v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  3. Corder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. Harrod v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API