Legal Opinion

Henlopen Acres, Inc. v. Potter

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 13, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is an action by a maintenance corporation to enforce by foreclosure a so-called lien for annual maintenance charges as provided by deed. The basic issue presented is the legality of an increase in the so-called maintenance assessments on the lot holders.

Plaintiff corporation admittedly is responsible for the management and maintenance of Henlopen Acres, a seashore development commenced in 1930. In 1947, defendant purchased for $1,700' a lot in the development. His deed thereto recited that the land conveyed was subject to “all the conditions, covenants, agreements,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Rodruck v. Sand Point Maintenance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Phillips v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kell v. Bella Vista Village Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Equitable Trust Co. v. O'NEILLSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Henlopen Acres v. PotterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API