Legal Opinion

Richardson v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 25, 1959No. Civ. A. 13928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

The question here present is a narrow one, and may be stated simply without the necessity for a recitation of all the contents of the stipulation of facts upon which the case has been submitted to the Court for determination. The said stipulation was agreed upon and filed by the parties, and we adopt it as the findings of fact necessary for compliance with Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A.

This case involves the application of Section 126 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 126, as added by § 134, Revenue Act of 1942, C. 619, 56 Stat. 798, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albert Fetter and Mary Louise Fetter, His Wife, Jointly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. O'Daniel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  3. Estate of Basch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  4. Dixon v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1950
  5. James M. Dixon and Jane McK Dixon, Executors of the Will of W. Lacy Dixon, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Wilkins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API