Legal Opinion
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 7, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00818Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: HAIR RELAXER MARKETING MDL No. 3060 SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 23-cv-0818 Judge Mary M. Rowland MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant L’Oréal S.A.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss the Master Long Form Complaint Against L’Oréal S.A. (“LSA Complaint”) and all claims asserted by Plaintiff Lillian Clemons (“Plaintiff”), including her Second Amended Short Form Complaint (“Second Amended SFC”) (Clemons Dkt [7]), under Rule 12(b)(2). 1…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.