Caroline Friedman v. Violetta Rose Phillips and Joseph Sidney Tompkins, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM;
A jury in the District Court awarded appellant a verdict of $2500 for personal injuries received. Appellant seeks a new trial on the issue of damages only. There was a conflict in evidence as to the nature, degree and source of injuries alleged.
In our view the issues were properly submitted to the jury with adequate instructions and there were no errors which warrant our disturbing the verdict.
The judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jerry Maiatico v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles DetwilerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Agnes Rodenbur v. Helen J. KaufmannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Powers v. CoatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Aleotti v. Whitaker Bros. Business MacHines, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- General Heating Engineering Company, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.