Legal Opinion

McClendon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1972No. 71-797PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment and sentence imposed on defendant following a plea of guilty to aggravated assault. The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 353.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rose v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Randolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. McClendon v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973