Goldmark v. Roseneeld
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the County Court of Milwaukee County. The case sufíiciently appears in the opinion. They contended, inter alia', that it was improper to join a motion to strike out a pleading with a motion for judgment. Fellows v. Prest, etc. of Menasha, 11 Wis. 559.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
This is an appeal from an order for judgment dismissing the action with costs, made by the county court February 26, 1887. The order also strikes from the files an amended complaint, and dissolves two injunctional orders granted in the action by a court commissioner. Judgment was regularly entered pursuant to the order, on March 22, 1887, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, and for costs. This appeal was taken March 28th. It is therefore too late. No appeal lies after judgment from an interlocutory order reviewable on an appeal from the judgment. Victor S. M. Co. v. Heller, 41…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Victor Sewing Machine Co. v. HellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Thornton v. EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murray v. ScribnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Wilder v. DunneSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Acker v. HerfurthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939