Creer v. Active Auto Exchange, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
By the first assignment of error the defendant claims that the allegation of the complaint as to the return of the Studebaker touring-car is deficient, and therefore insufficient, in that it fails to allege that the car when returned was substantially as valuable as when he received it. In Riley v. Mallory, 33 Conn. 201, wherein it is held that an infant may rescind all contracts, executory or executed, subject to three exceptions, the opinion states that this privilege of an infant constitutes a rule of law with exceptions, and is not itself an exception to the general rule enforcing all…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richmond v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Shailer v. BullockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Barber v. International Co. of MexicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Commonwealth v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Verdi v. DonahueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. McLucasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Sternlieb v. Normandie National Securities Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Adamowski v. Curtiss-Wright Flying Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.