Legal Opinion
Kent-Reese Enterprises, Inc., Raymond Douglass and Robert Reese v. Walter Hempy, Trustee of Big Boy Markets, Inc., Bankrupt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 1967No. 20845PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Senior Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the *911Northern District of California which held that certain transactions between appellants Douglass, Reese, and Kent-Reese Enterprises, Inc. (Kent-Reese); and Big Boy Markets, Inc. (Big Boy), now bankrupt, were preferential transfers in violation of Section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act, 30 Stat. 562 (1898), (amended by 64 Stat. 24 (1950)), 11 TJ.S.C. § 96 (1964). The suit was “brought by Walter Hempy, Trustee of Big Boy.
Jurisdiction was conferred on the district court by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1334;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mary K. Aulick, and Cross-Appellee v. Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Trustee for Ansel B. Solenberger, Bankrupt, and Cross-Appellant v. Eldridge M. LemleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- First National Bank v. Consolidated Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philip I. Palmer, Jr., Etc. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Paul F. Kapela v. Samuel NewmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Zimmerman v. Continental Bank (In Re Foland & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kent-Reese Enterprises, Inc., Raymond Douglass and Robert Reese v. Walter Hempy, Trustee of Big Boy Markets, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967