Legal Opinion
Sammis v. Town of Huntington
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtAspinall, J.
The question to be decided herein is whether or not the demurrer interposed by the defendant to the plaintiff’s complaint, upon the ground that the same does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, should be sustained or overruled.
The complaint in substance alleges that at all times referred to therein, prior to the passage of the Town Law, the trustees of the freeholders and commonalty of the town of Huntington were a municipal domestic corporation; that by virtue of the said Town Law, and the various amendments thereof, all the lands, rights and interests therein and all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lowndes v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Southampton v. Mecox Bay Oyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Taylor v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Bridges v. . B'd Supervisors of Sullivan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Denton v. JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hall v. WeatherfordArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Rainwater v. HobiekaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Hughes Realty Company v. BreitbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Edgewater Enterprises, Inc. v. HollerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Sammis v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.