Legal Opinion
Haas v. Clark
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Application for a writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtGoff, J.
Application for a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to take such action as will reinstate the petitioner to membership in good standing. On October 9, 1910, petitioner was a member of respondent, a membership corporation. On that day he sent to the club a letter, which was in part .as follows :
“To the Commodore and Members of the New York Motor Boat Club:
“ Gentlemekt.— With the deepest regret and for reasons that absolutely compel me, I hereby tender my resignation to your club. Enclosed you will find the flag which I carried with so much pride, as well as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- President of the Manhattan Co. v. KaldenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Noble v. EulerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Smith v. DanzigNew York Supreme Court · 1883
- Wilson v. Brentwood Hotel Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dwen v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Owyhee Grazing Ass'n v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Boston Club v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Dwen v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Leon v. Chrysler Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.