Rimkus v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The errors relied upon are: (1) The evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; (2) the fourth count does not allege an offense or crime against the United States and is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment; and (3) the verdict on the fourth count is so inconsistent with the acquittal on the other counts as to require a discharge of appellant.
The first error relied upon need not be considered at length. A perusal of the record leaves us in no doubt of there being some evidence in the record to support each material allegation of the fourth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Borum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Carrignan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kotrba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Thorne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965