Legal Opinion

Rimkus v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 1932No. 4661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The errors relied upon are: (1) The evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; (2) the fourth count does not allege an offense or crime against the United States and is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment; and (3) the verdict on the fourth count is so inconsistent with the acquittal on the other counts as to require a discharge of appellant.

The first error relied upon need not be considered at length. A perusal of the record leaves us in no doubt of there being some evidence in the record to support each material allegation of the fourth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Borum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Carrignan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kotrba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  2. Thorne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API