Legal Opinion

Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Smith

Binghamton City Court

Decided May 6, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBelihan, J.

This is a motion under section 27 of the Binghamton City Court Act (L. 1931, ch. 482) and rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it appears upon the face thereof that the complaint does not. state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The motion has been submitted upon affidavits, as well as upon the pleadings.

The action is in negligence. The complaint alleges, among other things, that a prior action had been instituted in the City Court of Binghamton, wherein Gorman Morgan was plaintiff and John L. Smith and Tanis Smith were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Bendernagle v. CocksNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. Kennedy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Pakas v. . HollingsheadNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clarcq v. Chamberlain Mobile Home Transport, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API