Legal Opinion
F.A. Bank v. . F.S.S. G.S.F.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1893PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In September, 1885, the plaintiff, a domestic banking corporation, loaned one Hofele fifteen thousand dollars upon his individual note payable in three months and secured by the pledge of an instrument which upon its face purported to be a certificate for one hundred sixty shares of stock of the defendant; a domestic railroad corporation having its office and principal place of business in the same city with the plaintiff. It was subsequently discovered that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tome v. Parkersburg Branch RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Commonwealth v. Reading Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Jarvis v. Manhattan Beach Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Penas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Plantsville Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Town of West Haven v. AimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Hudson Trust Co. v. . American Linseed Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.